Now after John was arrested, Jesus came into Galilee, proclaiming the gospel of God, and saying, "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel."Within the past couple of months, I just finished reading When Helping Hurts: How To Alleviate Poverty Without Hurting The Poor...And Yourself. Here are a couple of the main takeaways I got from the book:
Mark 1:14, 15
I must preach the good news of the kingdom of God to the other towns as well; for I was sent for this purpose.
Luke 4:43
- When we talk about poverty alleviation, what do we mean? Getting medical care to those who are in need? Feeding the hungry? Finding housing for the homeless? This book taught me that my definition of poverty alleviation isn't clear or comprehensive enough. Out of all the things I learned from this book, nothing was more significant for me than coming away with a biblically comprehensive definition of poverty alleviation. This definition is the foundation upon which this book builds and the banner that flies over everything else that the authors write so everything else depends on it. In my own words, to alleviate poverty is to enable men and women to glorify God and enjoy Him forever by working with them to restore in them (and ourselves) four relationships that were destroyed by the Fall: relationship with God, relationship with self, relationship with creation, and relationship with others. Failing to take into account any of these relationships as we attempt to alleviate poverty will inevitably lead to us hurting rather than helping the poor...and ourselves.
- All attempts in poverty alleviation essentially fall into one of three categories: relief, rehabilitation, or development. One of the biggest problems with the way we do poverty alleviation in the West is that the majority of our attempts to alleviate poverty fall into the category of relief. The reason this is a problem is because the majority of the poverty alleviation that the world needs is not relief. Relief should be immediate, temporary, and seldom, usually in response to an emergency or crisis. That means that the majority of our poverty alleviation should be rehabilitation or development. And even when we do engage in poverty alleviation by relief, we should do so developmentally.
- Avoid paternalism. In poverty alleviation, never, never, never do something for others that they can do for themselves because in so doing we treat them as inferior and hinder them from fully embracing and living in the reality that they are created in the image of God. In so doing, we damage rather than restore their their relationship with God, relationship with self, and relationship with us.
- In poverty alleviation, don't begin by asking people what they need. This implies that they are broken and we are not and that we have what they need to fix them, creating that inferiority/superiority dynamic that prevents them from being able to fully walk in being those who are created in the image of God. Instead of beginning by asking what they don't have, begin by asking what they do have to give in order for them to recognize they dignity, abilities, and gifts that they have to offer as men and women who are created in the image of God.
- In all poverty alleviation, the focus is people and processes, not products!
- In poverty alleviation, don't create blueprints to apply to people but take the time to develop processes suitable for them in their contexts and based on their knowledge, though this will definitely take longer than just developing a generalized blueprint for poverty relief that applies to all the poor. This requires time and relationship investment, which is really hard work!
That being said, I believe this book would be tremendously beneficial for anyone to read. It's thoroughly biblical, experiential, and balanced. In a day where the church so often finds itself split with some Christians focused on the here and now of the kingdom and other Christians focused on the yet to come of the kingdom, this book will challenge both sides to pursue the both/and of the gospel of the kingdom in its fullness. Jesus came for nothing less and He calls us to nothing less:
The mission of Jesus was and is to preach the good news of the kingdom of God, to say to one and all, "I am the King of kings and Lord of lords, and I am using My power to fix everything that sin has ruined"...
[Some seek] the King without the kingdom [those focused on the afterlife]...[Others seek] the kingdom without the King [those focused on the here and now]. The church needs a Christ-centered, fully-orbed, kingdom perspective to answer the question: "What would Jesus do?"
--Steve Corbett & Brian Fikkert, When Helping Hurts: How To Alleviate Poverty Without Hurting The Poor...And Yourself, p.32, 38
3 comments:
"And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell." (Matthew 10:28, ESV)
""But Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said, “Why do you think evil in your hearts? For which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Rise and walk’? But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins”—he then said to the paralytic—“Rise, pick up your bed and go home.”" (Matthew 9:4-6, ESV)
As we imitate the Lord Jesus in His compassion ministry, we also must imitate his perspective. The physical healing is a means God uses to bring people's attention to Jesus, who does something much more incredible than healing the body; He heals the soul, bringing it from death to life!
I love your blog Chris. It's very inspiring to see your frequent writings. I think I'll be coming around a little more often. ;)
Thanks for your encouragement and your thoughts Rob. Good to hear from you brother. I feel like it's been a while since I last saw you.
I have a question for you: do you think that there's a difference between the following two statements?
1) Healing the body is a means to the end of healing the soul
2) Healing the body and healing the soul are both an end in a sense. It's just that one end (healing the soul) takes higher priority than the other (healing the body).
I think what I hear you saying is statement 1. And I think I would be more inclined to align myself with statement 2.
The reason I say this is because in the new heavens and new earth, we are not going to abandon our bodies. We will have renewed bodies! So that seems to imply that the restoration of our bodies is an end that Jesus aims at in what He comes to earth to accomplish. It's just that unless we experience the restoration of our souls here in this life, we cannot experience the restoration of our bodies in the new heavens and new earth. But rather both our souls and our bodies will perish forever.
So one might almost be able to say that experiencing the healing of your soul in this life is the means by which you will be able to experience the healing of your body in the new heavens and the new earth.
And then that becomes the opposite of statement 1 if you try to relate the two types of healing in terms of means and end, which is what I think you said.
Jesus didn't offer healing of the body to everyone who needed it when He first came (John 5) but He only offered it to some even though He eventually plans to give full healing of the body (Philippians 3:21) to all in the new heavens and new earth. On the other hand, He offered full healing of the soul to everyone who needed it during His first coming (Matthew 11:28-30).
Therefore, I am inclined to conclude that both types of healing are ends that we should pursue, only one takes higher priority than the other.
What do you think?
I can consider that the healing of the body is only a shadow of the greater healing which would be the complete redemption of our body. I think I would agree with both #1 and #2.
So when people get healed physically, they get a taste of redemption and it becomes a means by which they would hear, believe and be saved (#1). The only problem with #2, is that we are not actually redeeming their bodies in any perfect sense. So we only provide a taste of redemption of the body.
But I still find myself having a bit of a problem with this fanciful thinking because Jesus himself told us the reason he did the healing. The purpose of the miracles were to authenticate his ministry and show that He was who He said He was. But let's not forget that when we talk of Jesus healing people, he did miracles! We can hardly claim that our feeding of the poor is miraculous.
In our arena, it is more like the good Samaritan where we are obeying the commandment to love our neighbor. And love is the outworking of faith. So as we are filled with the Holy Spirit, our faith is alive, loving our neighbor, and as we provide physical healing of the body, they experience the Holy Spirit working in us in both our deeds and words.
I picture the Christian as being filled with the Holy Spirit his heart overflowing with the love of God, pouring out love in both deeds that manifest as loving actions; and words, which manifest themselves as the Gospel, the Word, exhortations, warnings, encouragements, etc.
Post a Comment